Foundation – Isaac Asimov

Book #527

Reviewer: Ms Oh Waily


FI come to this book as an avowed fan of Isaac Asimov’s work.  His were the first and most memorable of the science fiction genre that I read as a teenager.  If I’m being honest, it has been a very long time since first reading the Foundation series, and I was concerned that I had allowed them to bask in the glow of a youthful fondness.

It turns out that I needn’t have worried.

Foundation is the first, in publication order, of the seven books written about the collapse of the First Galactic Empire and the series of events that ensue.  It is preceded, chronologically in the story by two prequels.

Originally published as a single volume in 1951, it was a set of five short stories that bind together to form a fairly coherent single volume story of the first 150-odd years of the ‘Foundation Era’ aka F.E.  As short stories they were previously published between 1942 and 1944.

The setting begins in the last years of the Galactic Empire, which has been in existence for 12,000 years.  Psychohistorian Hari Seldon is the central figure in the first of the five stories and play a very minor role throughout.  Psychohistory is used by the mathematician to predict the fall of the Empire and together with an impending 30,000 years of a futuristic “Dark Age” where all knowledge will be lost.  Seldon and his cohorts set out to shorten that Dark Age by thousands of years using the power of psychohistorical prediction.  To this end they manipulate two Foundations at either end of the galaxy.  In Foundation we are taken to a barren world, Terminus, and it’s progress through multiple “Seldon Crises” as viewed by the main protagonist in the crises resolution.

The writing is remarkably unharmed by 70+ years of advancement in science.  And although it is science fiction, it is still essentially about people and how they choose to behave, albeit in an imagined future setting.  The conflicts and vagaries of humankind here on present day Earth are mirrored and commented up in this classic piece of fiction.  I think it is quite amazing to realise that these stories were written by a 21 year old and were the beginnings of an entire fictional universe that over a span of 50 years of Asimov’s writing ties in fluidly with his other works – the Robot series and the Empire series – and has been taken further by other, modern, authors such as David Brin and David Bear.

Here is a small taster of the straightforward writing style. Hari Seldon is here confronting his newly arrived, and soon to be successor Gaal Dornick, with the numerical prediction of the fall of the Empire.

“And what of the numerical probability of total destruction within three centuries?”
“I couldn’t tell.”
“Surely you can perform a field-differentiation?”
Gaal felt himself under pressure.  He was not offered the calculator pad.  It was held a foot from his eyes.  He calculated furiously and felt his forehead grow slick with sweat.
He said, “About 85%?”
“Not bad,” said Seldon, thrusting out a lower lip, “but not good.  The actual figure is 92.5%”
Gaal said, “And so you are called Raven Seldon? I have seen none of this in the journals.”
“But of course not.  This is unprintable.  Do you suppose the Imperium could expose its shakiness in this manner? That is a very simple demonstration in psychohistory.  But some of our results have leaked out among the aristocracy.”
“That’s bad.”
“Not necessarily.  All is taken into account.”
“But is that why I’m being investigated?”
“Yes.  Everything about my project is being investigated.”
“Are you in danger, sir?”
“Oh, yes.  There is probability of 1.7% that I will be executed, but of course that will not stop the project.  We have taken that into account as well.”

As a long time fan it is hard to be completely unbiased, however if this book has one real failing it is the repetitiveness of background in some of the stories.  This is a natural consequence of the original short story format, but it does still grate a little.  If you are a fan of complex and complicated prose, then this is not likely to be for you.  If you wish to start a journey into a unique view of Asmiov’s future universe, then this is a very light and easy entryway.

Happy reading everyone.

Cold Comfort Farm – Stella Gibbons

Book #650
Reviewer: Tall, Short & Tiny

Cold Comfort FarmOne reviewer said of Cold Comfort Farm, “Very probably the funniest book ever written” (Julie Burchill, Sunday Times), while another touted it as having “comic aplomb”.

I tend to agree; this is an amusing story. The characters, the situation, the language – I found myself chuckling outwardly on many occasions. The names of the cows on the farm were especially amusing: Graceless, Aimless, Feckless and Pointless, and served to highlight this as a parody on the usually romanticised portrayal of rural life in the 1930s.

Following the death of her parents, Flora Poste is left wondering how she is going to make enough money to survive. In talking to her friend, Mrs Smiling, she decides to contact her various relatives, because “no limits are set, either by society or one’s own conscience, to the amount one may impose on one’s relatives”. She decides to visit distant relatives on Cold Comfort Farm, in Sussex, saying,

“I think if I find that I have any third cousins living at Cold Comfort Farm who are named Seth, or Reuben, I shall decide not to go….because highly sexed young men living on farms are always called Seth or Reuben, and it would be such a nuisance. And my cousin’s name, remember is Judith. That in itself is most ominous. Her husband is almost certain to be called Amos; and if he is, it will be a typical farm, and you know what they are like.”

The inhabitants of the farm – Aunt Ada, the Starkadders (Judith, Amos, Seth, Reuben and Elfine) and assorted workers – are all aware of a wrong done to her father in the past, and thus feel obligated to welcome Flora to their home. Each of the farm’s inhabitants has some kind of emotional problem, and the farm is badly run. Flora sets out to solve their problems, with the aid of her handbook, The Higher Common Sense. She introduces some of her relatives to professionals who can help them; she teaches them how to act in a modern and socially appropriate way, and enables romantic relationships (including her own) to form.

Gibbons’ writing is very relaxed and cheeky; she captures each situation and character perfectly, with humour and insight. She gives characters lines such as, “She has a brittle, hare-like quality…”, which is apparently a good thing.

With comments such as, “I propose to send a letter to the relatives I have mentioned…asking them if they are willing to give me a home in exchange for my beautiful eyes and a hundred pounds a year”, and “…I think we ought to dine out – don’t you? – to celebrate the inaugurations of my career as a parasite”, the story’s heroine initially seems self-centred and spoiled, but as the novel unfolds, it becomes apparent that she is a very good person indeed.

An amusing, easy read that will have you smiling, if not laughing, and deserving of 4 out of 5 stars.

The Summer Book – Tove Jansson

Book #352

Reviewer: Ms Oh Waily


TSBWhere do you start when you read the adult works of an author you enjoyed reading as a child?  That was my puzzle when I picked up Tove Jansson’s The Summer Book.
As a child I had read the Moomin stories and still have my copy of Finn Family Moomintroll on my children’s bookshelf.  This, however, was the first time I had read one of her six adult novels.  I wasn’t sure what to expect from a book that is hailed as a “modern Scandinavian classic”.

What we get is a series of vignettes of life lived on a small, remote island in the Gulf of Finland.  The characters, Grandmother, Papa and Sophia are inspired by Tove Jansson’s own family, her mother, brother and niece.  The island she describes is her family’s.

It is, on the surface, an interesting look into the relationship between Grandmother and Sophia as they live their lives through summer on their tiny island.  Interspersed there is a commentary on death, and life, that is unsurprising considering that Jansson wrote this in the year following the death of her own mother.  It is a lovely, simple, series of uneventful events that occur over a summer.  It is also an interesting look at a different way of living – remote, basic and yet quite fulfilling.

The writing is as simple and straightforward as you could expect.  The descriptions of the island and the environment hold you, like these passages taken from the chapter ‘Sophia’s Storm’.

The walls of the house trembled steadily with the thundering of the sea, and it began to get cold.  Spume from the breakers covered the windowpanes and ran over the sill and across the floor.  Every now and then Papa would get up and go out to see to the boat.

The seas breaking against the sheer outer side of the island had grown.  One after the other, the waves rose up in their white immensity to a tremendous height, and foam hissed against the rocks like the blows of a whip.  Tall curtains of water flew across the island sailed on west.  The storm was titanic!

[…]

Sophia climbed up into the tower.  The tower room was very small and had four windows, one for each point of the compass.  She saw that the island had shrunk and grown terribly small, nothing but an insignificant patch of rocks and colourless earth.  But the sea was immense: white and yellow and grey and horizonless.

At 172 pages, split into nice short observations of events, it is a relaxing and easy read. If you are interested, the image of the island on the book cover above is the Jansson’s island.  A round trip, walking, of about four and a half minutes.  It’s amazing what you can observe of human nature when you physically shrink your world and your mind is your source of inspiration.  This book is a testament to that.

Animal Farm – George Orwell

Book #564

Reviewer: Inspirationalreads

animal farm

There are not many unfamiliar (well, many readers) with this allegorical tale of farm animals rising up to overthrow their human owner and install a new regime in which all animals are equal and whatever goes upon two legs are the enemy.  With clear lines able to be drawn from this novel to the Russian revolution and the rise of Communism and Stalin, this novel has long been a popular staple of English curricula the world over.

Old Major, the ageing prize winning boar, calls all the animals of Manor Farm to a meeting, where he tells them of his thoughts on how animals are unfairly treated, that they are slaves to unworthy humans. When Old Major dies, his message is taken up by some of the younger pigs, who rally the animals into action, rising up against their particularly inept farmer and claiming the farm as their own.  With the pigs behind the brains of the operation, the animals successfully make the farm their own, creating Animalism, a mandate that follows seven commandments;

  1. Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
  2. Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
  3. No animal shall wear clothes.
  4. No animal shall sleep in a bed.
  5. No animal shall drink alcohol.
  6. No animal shall kill any other animal.
  7. All animals are equal.

However, this idealism is short lived and not all continues on in Animal Farm as initially hoped for, especially when some animals become “more equal” than others.

Written in 1945, Animal Farm is of a certain time and yet timeless in what it is trying to say and how it is being said.  Criticised at the time for being too heavy handed in its obvious views on Communism, particularly Stalinism,  by its author, this novel is short and clearly written.  This direct allegory allows for easy identification of its themes, even specific historical figures and events, making this ideal for younger readers and an obvious choice for English teachers.

Having never had to read it in this environment, I did not suffer for having to analyse and nit-pick at it over  a few months.  I was drawn into the story, sympathising with the well defined characters; rallying with them against their human oppressors, becoming horrified at the actions of the pigs as the story progressed.  I was entertained and enjoyed the time I spent in this  fable.  I will be passing it on to my 13 year old son to read, not knowing if it will be in any of his English classes as a set text, but I will be brushing up on my Russian Revolution knowledge.

Beasts of England is the rallying song of the animals movement.  I am off to see if I can find a youtube clip of it.

Beasts of England, Beasts of Ireland, Beasts of every land and clime, Hearken to my joyful tidings Of the Golden future time.
Soon or late the day is coming, Tyrant Man shall be o’erthrown, And the fruitful fields of England Shall be trod by beasts alone.
Rings shall vanish from our noses, And the harness from our back, Bit and spur shall rust forever, Cruel whips no more shall crack.
Riches more than mind can picture, Wheat and barley, oats and hay, Clover, beans and mangel-wurzels, Shall be ours upon that day.
Bright will shine the fields of England, Purer shall its waters be, Sweeter yet shall blow its breezes On the day that sets us free.
For that day we all must labour, Though we die before it break; Cows and horses, geese and turkeys, All must toil for freedom’s sake.
Beasts of England, Beasts of Ireland, Beasts of every land and clime, Hearken well, and spread my tidings Of the Golden future time

Sputnik Sweetheart – Haruki Murakami

Book #78

Reviewer: Angelo

1sputknik

Please welcome our newest reviewer Angelo.  We haven’t had a new addition to the team in a while and we look forward to many more insightful reviews.

“No man should go through life without once experiencing healthy, even bored solitude in the wilderness, finding himself depending solely on himself and thereby learning his true and hiddenstrength.”  – Jack Kerouac

Sputnik Sweetheart (translated from  the Japanese by Philip Gabriel) is the second Murakami novel I’ve read after Kafka on the Shore, which was my baptism of fire into Murakami’s perplexing world filled with unusual characters and dream-like events. And as it turned out,Sputnik Sweetheart hinges on the uncanny, and lonely.  If I did not make up my mind to deal with the theme of loneliness like it’s my closest neighbor knocking at my door., however, I would have had a nervous breakdown out of empathizing with the characters.

Sumire is an aspiring writer, who falls in love for the first time with, not a man, but another woman, Miu, Korean, seventeen years her senior. K, her close male friend who is infatuated with her, calls Miu her Sputnik Sweetheart. K, as the narrator, sees through what is happening to Sumire and Miu in the entire novel, and as such has a healthy sense of balance with the world and himself, his feelings, his philosophies. Miu, on the other hand, is poised and sophisticated, a businesswoman and knows French and Italian, is married but lonely.

Sumire’s relationship with Miu intensified when she accepted the latter’s offer to work for her. On their trip to Europe,  Sumire got lost (and in the end came back) leaving as clues two documents she wrote and hid, which K discovers and deciphers. The platonic relationship between K and Sumire makes it unbearably difficult for K whose feelings for Sumire never gets reciprocated. Sadly, Miu’s entrance into Sumire’s life slowly changed the seemingly misfitting Sumire, and her output as a writer waned.

The entire novel is told from the point-of-view of K, but  Murakami gave enough space for the two other characters. And, typical of him, Murakami meshes together disparate narratives that adds mystery to the entire novel. Just when the novel is about to end, that is when Sumire could not be found, K encounters a boy, his student, whose mother happens to be one of his girl friends, who steals things for no clear reason in the same way that Sumire gets lost and later comes back with no explanation for her disappearance.

The question this novel makes me ask is: Is loneliness so scary that it has to be removed from life? I can remember the lonely times of my life as a child, but I barely recall the intensity as much as that of loneliness in the adult life. Upon reflecting, I realized that loneliness relies on one’s dependency on another individual, thinking that such a complimentary association makes us feel complete when in fact, it is when we are alone  that we feel its power over us. We feel lonely when we do not get what we want from someone, another soul, undeniably a feeling so much stronger and longer-lasting than the loneliness we feel for things we can’t have.

Sputnik Sweetheart is neither for the faint of heart nor for those looking out for a predictable story. It is for those who are brave enough to embrace their loneliness, and hoping to make sense of their lives whenever solitude confronts them.